South PARS gas field---the biggest in the world---Would you like to do business?


For President Trump this is not worth his 'art of the deal'

For President Trump it is more important what his Hassidic Orthadox Jewish daughter says regarding Iran, Syria and the Middle East.

For President Trump it is more important what Netanyahu DEMANDS of him, rather than the strategic interests of the USA---Economic and military.

For President Trump the skekels he recieves from Orthadox Jewish supporters into his personal coffer is MORE IMPORTANT, than the strategic interests of the USA.....which determine his strategic policies.

President Trump indeed plays 3D chess but it is of the greasy Diego variety that relates to his personal enrichment and political survival, rather than honestly batting for the USA.

President Trump sends IMPERIAL EDICTS to powerful nations demanding that they comply with American sanctions against Iran, against Russia, against Venezuela......but don't these important nations have economic interests related to lawful International trade worth $ trillions...and the jobs of millions?

From the pulpit of the TROTSKYITE-LIKUD POLITICAL PLATFORM .......President Trump and his cabinet of War Hawkes and torturers wish to shape the world in their fashion.....good luck!


A Dog and Pony Show


Netanyahoo's "Iran Files" are Well Known, Old and Purloined from Vienna

By Moon of Alabama

The dog and pony show the Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahoo provided yesterday (videoslideshow) was not based on material Israeli secret services acquired in Iran, but most likely from data Iran provided to the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) during the implementation period of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA, pdf).

Ali Vaez, director of the Iran Project at the Crisis Group, was the first to propose this thesis:
Ali Vaez @AliVaez - 18:06 UTC - 30 Apr 2018
5/ It appears to me that what Israel has done is that it has probably hacked the @iaeaorg and gathered some new details from what Iran responded to the agency to close the outstanding issues in 2015: IAEA Board Adopts Landmark Resolution on Iran PMD Case
Several nuclear proliferation experts point out that there was nothing new in Netanyahoo's presentation:
Jeffrey Lewis @ArmsControlWonk - 00:14 UTC- 1 May 2018
Let's go through Netanyahu's dog-and-pony show. As you will see, everything he said was already known to the IAEA and published in IAEA GOV/2015/68 (2015). There is literally nothing new here and nothing that changes the wisdom of the JCPOA. 1/10
All the graphics, pictures and technical details Netanyahoo quoted were known to the IAEA and the negotiators of the agreement with Iran.
The tale the Israelis provide to explain  how they got access to the files does not fit to the content of the "highly theatrical" presentation:
The senior Israeli official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss a secret mission, said that Israel’s Mossad intelligence service discovered the warehouse in February 2016, and had the building under surveillance since then.
Mossad operatives broke into the building one night last January, removed the original documents and smuggled them back to Israel the same night, the official said.
Esfandyar Batmanghelidj, a political scientist at Columbia University, points to this slide and satellite picture in Netanyahoo's presentation:

The pictured slide claims that Iran moved files to that location in 2017. But the Israeli sources tell the NYT that the Mossad detected the warehouse in early 2016. Why, if no nuclear files were there at that time, did the Mossad put a random warehouse in Tehran under observation?
Most likely both claims are false.

The slide above shows a screenshot of a satellite picture of Shurabad, a warehousing district in south Tehran. The coordinates are 35.494257. N, 51.356535 E.

By comparing changes in the pictured buildings and a Google Earth historic timeline of satellite pictures Batmanghelidj finds that the picture Netanyahoo showed  in his slide must have been taken between September 2014 and November 2015.

Other researchers confirm this analysis. Batmanghelidj notes that this time frame corresponds to the 'implementation period' of the JCPOA which began in January 2014 and ended in July 2015. During the period Iran provided, as agreed in the JCPOA, information about its nuclear research and gave IAEA inspectors access to all relevant locations and source material.

Israel claims it detected the archive site in early 2016. How does that fit with a satellite picture in the presentation that was then already replaced by newer ones and only available in a historic timeline view?

Presumably the satellite picture was part of the stash the Israelis acquired. But:
  • Iran had no reason to give the IAEA such a picture. It gave the IAEA inspectors physical access to its sites and did not hide anything.
  • The IAEA uses (pdf) Wikimapia, Google Earth and other open source tools to pursue and to document its work.
  • It is thus very likely that the IAEA made that screenshot of a satellite picture at the time it inspected the site during the 2014 and 2015 period to document its work.
There are more inconsistencies in Netanyahoo's stunt. One of his slides shows the potential position of a nuclear device in a missile as drawn in a well known 2003 sketch by Iranian scientists. He later claims that current Iranian missiles with a longer range could hold such a device.

That is wrong. The new Iranian missiles use a "baby bottle" nose cone that is too small to hold a device like the one researched by Iranian scientist 15 years ago. No current Iranian missile is capable of carrying such a nuclear device.

Following Netanyahoo's scaremongering show the IAEA provided this statement:
In December 2015, IAEA Director General Yukiya Amano presented the Final Assessment on past and present outstanding issues regarding Iran’s nuclear programme to the IAEA Board of Governors.
The Agency’s overall assessment was that a range of activities relevant to the development of a nuclear explosive device were conducted in Iran prior to the end of 2003 as a coordinated effort, and some activities took place after 2003. The Agency also assessed that these activities did not advance beyond feasibility and scientific studies, and the acquisition of certain relevant technical competences and capabilities.
Based on the Director General’s report, the Board of Governors declared that its consideration of this issue was closed.
Iran did feasibility studies to assess what was needed to start a nuclear weapon development program. It never started such a program. The feasibility studies were related to a potential Iraqi nuclear weapon program which would have threatened Iran. When the U.S. invaded Iraq in 2003 the potential danger of a hostile Iraq dissolved and Iran shut down its studies. The shutdown in 2003 was confirmed in a U.S. National Intelligence Estimate in 2007 and by the IAEA.

Netanyahoo presented old material of Iran's old feasibility studies. Everything he presented was already well known and the technical details had long been discussed at length.

The claims of how and when the Israelis intelligence acquired the files do not make sense. The Mossad fairytale is that its agents broke into a warehouse building in Tehran, opened two dozen combination lock safes (slide 8 in the show), hauled out half a ton of materials and put those onto a plane to Israel in the very same night. Even Hollywood would reject such an implausible script.
The folders Netanyahoo presented were all empty.

The 2014/15 satellite picture used by Netanyahoo in his slides is a further indication that the material was not obtained in Iran but from a (digital) archive at the IAEA in Vienna. The "half a ton" material of "55,000 printed pages" and "183 CDs" that Netanyahoo implausibly claims was smuggled out of a "warehouse" in Tehran are most likely just a bunch of old data-files from the 2014/2015 IAEA investigation copied from a digital IAEA archive in Vienna. 

They likely fit on a SSD drive or a handful of USB sticks.
Netanyahoo presented nonsense and lied just as he always does.


Cuomo--interviews another CORRUPT POLITICIAN facing criminal charges


The Mullahs in Iran were brought into power by the Carter administration using the State Department, the CIA, the Pentagon and European allies (1977--1979). France and the UK playing a very active auxiliary role. Some things don't change that much. Paris became the base where Ayatollah Khomeini grandstanded from with the aid of the BBC world Farsi service, and STRATEGIC guidance and communication from the CIA....and their operatives in Iran to make the 'Islamic Revolution' possible. Most Iranians did not want an Islamic Revolution (Syria).....why would they????

US had extensive contact with Ayatollah Khomeini before Iran ...

The MOSSAD station chief in Iran joined the crowd in cheering and welcoming Khomenei at the airport.....on 1st February 1979.

Why did the Globalist Carter administration do this? Remove a trusted ally of 26 years who was designated by Nixon as the 'Policeman of the Persian Gulf'......who purchased like Saudi Arabia 100 of billions $ worth of arms from the MIC...usually overpriced...and $500 million worth of annual arms purchase from Israel; cheap subsidised oil for Israel.....and an obedient dog of the USA, which parked $10 of billions of its petro-$ in American banks.

Iran part of the SEATO military block against the Soviet Union, and set up by the Eisenhower administration in 1954. Iran containing many important military spy stations of the USA.

What could be sweeter for the USA? Great strategic historical Persia, a vassal state of the USA.

However, the USA itself is not an independent country. 

At the Grand strategic level, it is run by the Jew Rothschilds family of London via their lieutenants in the USA.

The Jew Rothschilds of London had a new great idea.

The new idea was to sponsor through the spooks, Islamic fundamentalist groups in the Greater Middle East in order to destabilise and further control the Greater Middle East, and set up the bear trap and give the Soviet Union its own Vietnam. 

All this destabilisation would also help create Eretz Israel.
Image result for eretz israel

'The Arc of Crisis' 'Clash of civilisation' 'Operation Cyclone' all penned in Rothschilds London from the 1970's.

and sounded out in the Bilderberg group, CFR and various think tanks of America in the 1970's with the key critical role being played by Bernard Lewis a Jew super spy from the FO sent to the USA to spread the idea. ....perched at Princeton University. One of his disciples being Samuel Huntington a witless American professor....a front for this new idea.

The Republican Party would not accept such a plan of backstabbing allies and creating indeterminate chaos which would harm strategic American interests. However, the Democratic Party, always more 'GLOBALIST'.....the party which got 80% of the Jewish vote was open to this idea..... with directions from the Rockefellers....and after crying all day in the Whitehouse when Carter realised he had no real power, he brought in GLOBALISTS into his administration, namely Zbig Brezenski as NSA. 

The mullahs are bad, but bad mostly to their own people, that does not constitute a real threat to Israel which I will explain briefly later.

  • They have killed 10,000's thousands of Iranian political opponents inside Iran and abroad (excelling the CIA puppet Shah by a factor of 10 or 20)
  • 5,000,000 million mostly educated Iranians have left the country due to mullah rule; unprecedented since the exodus after the Arab invasion in 638 AD.
  • $1.5 trillion capital flight followed these educated Iranians emigrating.
  • 750,000 Iranian men and boys died in the Iran/Iraq war.
  • The Iranian economy is run as a corrupt mullah lottery, which is not stable. The protests recently were about economic issues above all else, and the regime in Tehran new this fact.
  • The inherent absurdity of primitive illiterate mullahs running a modern state.

What Bibi has to understand is that the Rothschilds of London want such a 'wonderful Kafkaesque state' to be unmolested fundamentally by anyone and everyone....as has been the case since 1979---for 39 years.

The mullahs are wary of the conventional armed forces, lest there is a coup. As such they are kept underfunded and small by global standards:

350,000    Artesh
52,000      Airforce.....with 100--200 jets that can fly???
22,000      Navy

About 3% of GDP spent on defence, even during the height of threats from the Bush II era which were pretty real, and came very close to real attacks. Israel 9% of GDP real defence expenditure; USA 5% of GDP real GDP defence expenditure; North Korea is around 25% of GDP defence expenditure.

Iran has no credible offensive capability...and more critically the mullahs don't want to give them any offensive capability. 

The only armed Iranian groups abroad are the Revolutionary Guard militia, devoid of any heavy equipment, but suited for lightly armed guerrilla warfare. 2,000 in Syria engaging ISIS (requested by the Syrian government to come in officially), 

and 1000 in Iraq from the Quds Brigade...invited officially in by the USA and Paul Bremer in 2004 (Shia vs Sunni meme).

AND what great feat have the 2000 Pasdaran achieved in Syria that has Netanyahu shitting in his pants?

4 of their generals have died in Syria due to Israeli/ISIS cooperation and coordination.

1000 IRGC members have died fighting ISIS and Israeli air attacks...in defence of ISIS. 


American Intelligence Media---London Rothschild control of the USA


JEWISH COCK Brothers front, Mike Pompeo


False Flag Syria


John Bolton


Its not that John Bolton has been calling for attacks against Iran for the last 16 years......he wouldn't be the first Neocon to do so, for his Israeli masters.

The Israelis have been alleging the very same since the 1980's. (Iran is 6 months away from the nuke bomb)......

American intelligence confirmed in their annual intelligence assessment report of 2007 that Iran did not have a covert nuke bomb program.

Iran since 2003 has been under intense IAEA inspections and they have not found any covert nuke programs.

Unlike North Korea Iran has not thrown out IAEA inspectors.

Unlike North Korea Iran has not threatened anybody with nuke bombs.

Unlike North Korea Iran has not exploded any nuclear bombs.

Unlike the North Korean leader, the Iranian Supreme Leader has again, again, again disavowed nuke bombs as unIslamic.

When Saddam from 1984 started using German manufactured Chemical weapons against Iranian troops, the Iranians responded by sending the affected soldiers to Western hospitals and attempted to purchase gas masks (Blocked by the USA)...but DID NOT USE CHEMICAL WEAPONS against the Iraqis.

Turkey, Egypt, GCC countries, Algeria, Saudi Arabia, Indonesia, Malaysia will soon have nuclear reactors that use Uranium, WITH THE ASSISTANCE OF RUSSIA MOSTLY......will Israel attack them too?

An attack on Iran's nuclear sites of whatever magnitude, will discredit the Supreme Leader and accelerate into a surge Iran's nuclear bomb program and will result in the expulsion of the IAEA from the country.

An attack on Iran's military facilities in Iran will facilitate nuclear bomb surge programs in several countries, including Turkey and Egypt.

An attack on Iran's military facilities in Iran will discredit the International agreement between Iran and the 5+1 powers........the illusion that the USA is a reliable superpower.

For what it is worth the MOSSAD and the CIA do not think Iran has a nuke bomb program, despite years killing Iranian nuke scientists and carrying out terrorism inside the country using MEK and Jundallah.(If these kinda guys say Iran does not have nuke bomb program then it means something !!!!!)


Iran is in Iraq because of Israel----not due to a MASTERFUL plan by the genius mullahs, AND with the aid of the USA (Shia vs Sunni meme)

Iran is in Syria because of Israel----not due to a MASTERFUL plan by the genius mullahs, AND with the aid of the USA (Shia vs Sunni meme)

Iran is in Lebanon because of Israel----not due to a MASTERFUL plan by the genius mullahs, AND with the aid of the USA (Shia vs Sunni meme)

You need missiles....all types and range to defend against ILLEGAL Israeli ATTACKS, and Israeli support of ISIS.

Only rapture fucks and corrupt politicians running from the law would be baying for war, and surgical strikes with no consequences. 

Iran is not Syria in 2007

Iran is not Iraq in 1981, where the country was BUSY fighting Iran at the behest of the CIA in Jordan.



American Intelligence Media---No Russian Collusion

President Trump didn't have to Bomb Syria just to prove that either.

He didn't have to bring in Bush Nazis to disprove that either.








ISIS Used Chemical Arms at Least 52 Times in Syria and Iraq, Report Says

By Eric Schmidt at the New York Times

A cemetery on the outskirts of Gaziantep, Turkey. Grave No. 38487 holds the body of a 4-year-old girl who died of wounds she received when a shell containing sulfur mustard agent hit her home in Marea, Syria.CreditBryan Denton for The New York Times

The Islamic State has used chemical weapons, including chlorine and sulfur mustard agents, at least 52 times on the battlefield in Syria and Iraq since it swept to power in 2014, according to a new independent analysis.
More than one-third of those chemical attacks have come in and around Mosul, the Islamic State stronghold in northern Iraq, according to the assessment by the IHS Conflict Monitor, a London-based intelligence collection and analysis service.
The IHS conclusions, which are based on local news reports, social media and Islamic State propaganda, mark the broadest compilation of chemical attacks in the conflict. American and Iraqi military officials have expressed growing alarm over the prospect of additional chemical attacks as the allies press to regain both Mosul and Raqqa, the Islamic State capital in Syria.

Reported attacks with chemical weapons.
100 Miles

“The coalition is concerned about ISIL’s use of chemical weapons,” Col. John Dorrian, a military spokesman in Iraq, said in an email on Monday, using another name for the Islamic State. “ISIL has used them in Iraq and Syria in the past, and we expect them to continue employing these types of weapons.”
Colonel Dorrian said that the Islamic State’s ability to use chemical weapons is “rudimentary,” and that American, Iraqi and other allied troops are equipped to deal with the impact of these chemical attacks — typically rockets, mortar shells or artillery shells filled with chemical agents. The effects of these chemical munitions thus far have been limited to the immediate area where they land.
Continue reading the main story
the IHS assessment is to be made public on Tuesday. The New York Times obtained an advance copy of the assessment and the location of the 52 reported chemical attacks. The analysis did not break down the cases by type of chemical attack.
In an effort to blunt the Islamic State’s ability to make the weapons, the American-led air campaign has bombed militants associated with overseeing their production and the facilities where chemical ordnance is manufactured. In September, for instance, allied warplanes attacked a converted pharmaceutical factory in northern Iraq thought to have been a chemical weapons production facility.
As Iraqi forces now advance into Mosul, analysts warned that the Islamic State could unleash more chemical attacks as they cede control. Iraqi forces have reclaimed about one-third of Mosul, Iraq’s second-largest city.
“As the Islamic State loses ground around Mosul, there is a high risk of the group using chemical weapons to slow down and demoralize advancing enemy forces.” said Columb Strack, a senior analyst and the head of the IHS Conflict Monitor. “And to potentially make an example of — and take revenge on — civilian dissidents within the city.”
At least 19 of the 52 chemical attacks have taken place in and around Mosul, according to the IHS data, but the assessment noted a decline in attacks before the Iraqi-led offensive against the city.
“Mosul was at the center of the Islamic State’s chemical weapons production,” Mr. Strack said. “But most of the equipment and experts were probably evacuated to Syria in the weeks and months leading up to the Mosul offensive, along with convoys of other senior members and their families.”
The Islamic State is not the only actor in Syria to carry out chemical weapons’ strikes: The Syrian government has conducted many more such attacks.
Syrian military helicopters dropped bombs containing chlorine on civilians in at least two attacks over the past two years, a special joint investigation of the United Nations and an international chemical weapons monitor said in August.
Beginning last year, American officials confirmed the first instances of the Islamic State using sulfur mustard, a chemical warfare agent, and the presence of the mustard gas on fragments of ordnance used in attacks by the group in Syria and Iraq. Laboratory tests, which were also performed on scraps of clothing from victims, showed the presence of a partly degraded form of distilled sulfur mustard, an internationally banned substance that burns a victim’s skin, breathing passages and eyes.
Chemical warfare agents, broadly condemned and banned by most nations under international convention, are indiscriminate. They are also difficult to defend against without specialized equipment, which many of the Islamic State’s foes in Iraq and Syria lack. The chemical agents are worrisome as potential terrorist weapons, even though chlorine and blister agents are typically less lethal than bullets, shrapnel or explosives.
It was unclear how the Islamic State had obtained sulfur mustard, a banned substance with a narrow chemical warfare application. Both the former Hussein government in Iraq and the current government in Syria at one point possessed chemical warfare programs.
Chlorine is commercially available as an industrial chemical and has been used occasionally by bomb makers from Sunni militant groups in Iraq for about a decade. But it is not known how the Islamic State would have obtained sulfur mustard, the officials said.
Abandoned and aging chemical munitions produced by Iraq during its war against Iran in the 1980s were used in roadside bombs against American forces during the occupation that followed the 2003 American invasion of Iraq. But American officials have said the types of ordnance that have been publicly disclosed so far have not matched known chemical ordnance in the former Iraqi inventory.
The attacks have been geographically scattered and have varied in their delivery systems, suggesting that the Islamic State had access to, and was experimenting with, different types of rockets and shells configured to carry chemical warfare agents or toxic industrial chemicals.
One theory is that the militants were manufacturing a crude mustard agent themselves, American officials say. Another theory is that the Islamic State acquired sulfur mustard from undeclared stocks in Syria, either through capture or by purchasing it from corrupt officials, although this theory is not widely held by American analysts.

Syria False Flag


Germany's Largest Public TV News Broadcaster: Syria Chemical Attack "Most Likely Staged"

By Tyler Durden at Zero Hedge

A senior correspondent for German state media broadcast ZDF heute stunned his European audience during a report from on the ground in Syria when he gave a straightforward and honest account of his findings while investigating what happened in Douma. The veteran reporter, Uli Gack, interviewed multiple eyewitnesses of the April 7 alleged chemical attack and concluded of the testimonials, 

"the Douma chemical attack is most likely staged, a great many people here seem very convinced."

It appears that all local Syrians encountered by the German public broadcast reporter were immediately dismissive of the widespread allegation that the Syrian government gassed civilians, which the US, UK, France, and Israel used a pretext for launching missile strikes on Damascus.

ZDF heute: The world continues to puzzle over whether the banned chemical weapons were used in Douma. ZDF correspondent Uli Gack is in Syria for us: "you were in a large refugee camp today and talked to a lot of people - what did you hear about the attack there?" Gack responded, "the Douma chemical attack is most likely staged, a great many people here seem very convinced."
The German ZDF report is consistent with veteran British journalist Robert Fisk's investigation upon being the first Western journalist to gain access to the site in Douma. Fisk reported early this week, "There are the many people I talked to amid the ruins of the town who said they had 'never believed in' gas stories–which were usually put about, they claimed, by the armed Islamist groups."
Die Welt rätselt weiter, ob die geächteten in eingesetzt wurden. ZDF-Korrespondent Uli Gack ist für uns in - Sie waren heute in einem großen Flüchtlingscamp und haben mit vielen Leuten gesprochen - was haben Sie denn dort über den Angriff gehört?

ZDF (Zweites Deutsches Fernsehen) is one of Germany's largest and oldest state-owned channels, which is funded in part through citizens paying a household licensing fee, and Heute is perhaps the most visible public news program in all of Germany.
According to the live report, some witnesses told ZDF that Islamist rebels killed victims with chlorine, filmed the scenes, then claimed an 'Assad chemical attack'. Though interviewing "a great many people [who] seem convinced" that a chemical attack did not actually happen, the reporter did not attempt to censor what he consistently heard from locals who were said to be in the area when the events occurred.
Increasingly, it appears that mainstream media gate-keepers are losing it over the fact that so many highly visible and respected reporters and broadcasters have featured reports this week which publicly question the Syrian chemical attack narrative and US coalition missile strikes that followed.
One writer for the Guardian and Daily Beast who is a well-known pro regime-change advocate, for example, laments that "disinformation has taken hold" on Syria. In a series of tweets following Robert Fisk's bombshell report for the Independent, Emma Beals, who often simply parrots whatever her 'rebel' sources tell her reacted to the recent profusion of high profile pundits questioning the established narrative on major British platforms
Beals wrote:
My educated and informed friends are emailing me en masse asking me about what's going on in Syria because "it's so hard to work out the truth." Having spent years busting a gut to dig it out, it's heartbreaking to see the extent to which disinformation has taken hold.
My educated and informed friends are emailing me en masse asking me about what's going on in Syria because "it's so hard to work out the truth." Having spent years busting a gut to dig it out, it's heartbreaking to see the extent to which disinformation has taken hold.

Syrian War for Dummies: Disney Version--
Once upon a time, a country called Syria was ruled by a ruthless dictator named Bashar Al-Assad. He was a cruel man who gassed his own people. His actions caused a civil war in Syria. America and Europe tried their best to stop the devastating civil war, and even generously accepted many Syrian refugees. Eventually America went to Syria, defeated ISIS, and is now trying to restore stability.
This above version is quite popular among many Americans and Europeans and the Western mainstream media.
Meanwhile, almost simultaneous to German TV's ZDF heute report from Syria, lawyers of the Bundestag (German federal parliament) issued a legal brief on the US-led strike on Syria. The government lawyers' report was requested by the left-wing party Die Linke in response to the US coalition missile strikes which primarily targeted facilities in and around Damascus.
"The deployment of military force against a state to punish it for breaking an international convention is a violation of the international law prohibiting violence," reads the report, as cited by the German Press agency DPA and translated by Sputnik.
The legal report further concluded that the US-led attack on Syria - which skirted the UN - but which was supported by the German government (though without German military participation) was based in chemical attack claims that the legal team deemed "not convincing"


Syria False Flag---Carla Ortiz


Syria False Flag--Jimmy Dore


Syria False Flag


Genie Oil:

Genie Energy Ltd. is an American energy company headquartered in Newark, New Jersey. It is a holding company comprising Genie Retail Energy, a retail energy provider in the United States, and Genie Oil and Gas, which is pursuing a conventional oil project in the Israeli-occupied Syrian Golan Heights.
Genie was part of IDT Corporation but was spun off on October 31, 2011, at which point Class B common stock of Genie Energy Ltd. began trading on the NYSE under the ticker symbol "GNE". [1]
Genie's founder, chairman, controlling shareholder and CEO is Howard Jonas. Avi Goldin serves as the company's CFO, Michael Stein is the company's COO and Geoffrey Rochwarger serves as Vice Chairman. The president of its Israeli subsidiary is Effie Eitam. Genie Energy's Strategic advisory board is composed of: Dick Cheney (former vice president of the United States), Rupert Murdoch (media mogul and chairman of News Corp), James Woolsey(former CIA director), Larry Summers (former head of the US Treasury), Bill Richardson, former Governor of New Mexico, an ex-ambassador to the United Nations and United States Energy Secretary.[2]Michael SteinhardtJacob Rothschild,[3].[2], and Mary Landrieu. Former United States Senator from Louisiana.
In 2013, IDT Energy, Inc., a subsidiary of Genie Energy, acquired both Dallas-based Diversegy, LLC a commercial energy advisory and its network marketing channel, Epiq Energy. They are now wholly owned subsidiaries of Genie Energy Ltd.[4]