The Rothschild Organ And Octoputin - Projection or Envy?
By Moon of Alabama.
The title page of this weeks Economist:
Now consider one of the earliest cartoons that used this image:
The Rothschild banking family of England, Coin’s Financial School, (1894) - bigger
At least 26% of the British Economist is owned by the Rothschild family. Lynn Forester de Rothschild and her spouse Evelyn de Rothschild are sitting on the board of the Economist Group.
Is the publishing of the Putin squid by the Rothschild organ some kind of psychological projection? Or is it envy? (Both .......in my case, and the reason why I can't live in the UK....its envy...don't underestimate it as a human emotion. These Satanic inbred bastards are full of it .....
(i) with Russia it is its size;
(ii) the $80 trillion minerals in Russia;
(iii) A holdover of the Imperial competition between the British Empire and Imperial Russia from the 1830's onwards marked Russia in the British elite Psyche as a competitor and an enemy state.
This continued after WWII when Churchill killed Roosevelt(Who wanted better relations with Russia, and downsize the importance of the UK and its empire ) and Churchill is the one who gave the Iron curtain speech. The British initiated the Cold War, and had drawn up plans to attack Soviet Russia, with USA nukes immediately after the defeat of Hitler. The USA declined the latter plan but did initiate the Cold War Kabuki theatre for its MIC.
That kind of evil DEVIOUS satanic venom can only come from the Rothschilds of London (attack Soviet Russia when it was already destroyed and 30 million of its people had already died in WWII, and the LEAD nation which destroyed the Wehrmacht---a great service to the world, regardless of its political position)
The picture of Putin as meddling octopus attacking democracies is, of course, dumb nonsense. There is no evidence that the Russian government was in any way involved in the U.S. election. The French and the German government have repudiated claims of "Russian hacking" in their countries' elections. The one country that meddles everywhere and destroys democracies left and right is, of course, the United States.
The octopus in cartoons is often associated with antisemitic Nazi propaganda and therefore frowned upon. When the German Süddeutsche Zeitung depicted Facebook owner Mark Zuckerberg as an octopus which sucks up all data, the usual suspects were up in arms.
But historically the octopus cartoons were most often used to represent a country or empire.
Last year the Atlantic Sentenial wrote about The Octopus in Political Cartoons. Russia has frequently been depict as such (1904, 1937 1948, 1950, ...). Britain, France, Prussia, Germany, Austria, Japan and the U.S. were likewise caricatured as tentacled dangers. Britain's Winston Churchill appeared as a bloodsucking sea monster.
In 1904 an octopus showed the Standard Oil company entangling the White House, Congress and the U.S. people. Today there are other companies, bankers and extremely rich families who have such undue influence. We should fear and fight their meddling and not the president of a comparably benign Eurasian country.